Thursday, 29 May 2008

Inflation/Deflation debate is BUNK! 2008-05-29.

Thursday 29th May 2008: Inflation/Deflation debate is bunk.

It just is.

Basically, whether we get inflation or deflation, what is relevant is only whether there is creation or destruction of wealth. We seem to be entering an era where there is a likelihood of massive destruction of wealth.

A period of severe inflation or deflation is at hand - and it is the result only of the destruction of wealth that is now happening. A lot of this is concerned with default on debt - the inability to pay down the debt principal or even the interest due on the debt. The cause of this is excessive debt that has built up due mainly to central bank and government policies of inflation of the money supply and the distribution of this excess money into the financial system, into the hands of banks rather than into the hands of those who produce wealth for the economy. In other words, gross malinvestment.

We have entered into a period, proven by the increasing and extreme ampltude of oscillation of the Dow Jones stock index to Gold ratio, where it is becoming impossible to value anything in terms of money, or even in terms of anything else. The entire economic system is completely broken. Many say that the Dow:Gold ratio measures values of paper assets vs real assets. I think that it is only part of the story. In fact, the Dow stocks represent real companies and real productivity and are therefore semi-tangible. Although the stock prices are based on 'faith' or confidence in those companies and are paper assets, their values are also governed by sales, profits, cash dividend payments and other 'real' assets of those companies such as real estate, plant and equipment.

The wild oscillation of the Dow:Gold ratio from 1:1 in 1980 to 43:1 in 2000 is a change by a factor of above 40! This means that, in a fiat money system, the value of one asset is not knowable in terms of another asset within a factor of 40! This is outrageous in a so-called 'stable' economy and is proof positive that the economy is not stable. I think that this huge volatility is a key factor that has been ignored.

Note from my previous blog entries (Chart hints at Financial Disintegration: 2007-12-23) that the instability began in the 1920s, shortly before the USA went off the Gold Standard, but after World War I when many industrial nations had already left the Gold Standard (such as England in 1914). Coincidence? I think not!

Contemporary with this was the Hyperinflation in Germany of 1923 and a short re-emergence of the Gold Standard in England in 1925, unsustainable because of highly inflationary policies during that period. The 1920s stock market bubble is what led to the first major off-trend high on the chart - and the major low that followed is the early 1930s 90% crash in the Dow Jones, which was followed by the seizure of private gold by Roosavelt in 1933 and the subsequent 40% US Dollar devaluation from $20.67 per ouice of gold to $35 per ounce.

The above chart is my adaptation of the Dow-Gold since 1800 sharelynx chart, with thanks to Nick at sharelynx for permission.

The bottoms of the Dow:Gold ratio in 1933 and 1980 represent major recessions/depressions, one deflationary and one inflationary. The ratio is oblivious to which. The three tops in 1929, 1966 and 2000 represent the euphoria of stock market/financial manias, regardless of the level of inflation at the time, although they probably all represent inflation (in paper aassets, though not necessarily in consumer prices).

In fact at the time of highest consumer price inflation during the 1970s, the Dow:Gold ratio was falling fast. The previous fall in the 1930s was during a deflation (with the 1933-34 inflationary policy of dollar devaluation accompanying it)! In both cases, stocks fell massively with respect to gold.

The present fall since 2000 has now gone further than this chart shows, to a ratio of 12 (12,000 Dow and $1000 Gold) and hints at serious recession/depression to come. However, it says nothing about whether it is inflationary or deflationary. It merely shows the destruction of financial assets by one form of default or another. Deflation is default through non-payment and bankruptcy; inflation is default through devaluation of the currency and consequent loss of purchasing power of the nominally repaid debt.

So all these people on the Internet 'talking their book' and wasting your time and money getting you to subscribe to their worthless commentaries about deflation vs inflation are giving you worthless arguments. It is all complete guesswork. Half of them will be wrong and you won't know which half until it is done. Probably, they all will be wrong one way or another. I have nothing to sell, therefore I am essentially unbiased. I am just writing this because I am bored!

Only two things are apparent from the chart:
1. In both cases ('30s and '70s, deflation and inflation), stocks fell massively with respect to gold.
2. The economic instability is increasing with every cycle and valuing anything correctly is becoming impossible, which hints at economic and monetary destruction, possibly at the next extreme of the cycle.
Now, I have noticed two more things:
3. This chart pattern is like a positive feedback loop as I described in an earier blog entry. Unlike other chart patterns with trendlines, it is impossible to break out of these expanding trendlines, unless a catastrophic event occurs on the downside or upside. The only option would be to try to stabilise the ratio within these trendlines, near to the mean. The swing is already a factor of x43, so do you think it will be possible to stabilise within these trendlines near to mean, to get the ratio to sit in the original green channel again, under this present monetary system? I don't.
4. With each oscillation, the Dow:Gold ratio is spending less time above the original, stable, slowly rising green trend channel and more time below it. This hints that financial assets in a secular sense are becoming gradually less favoured than tangible assets (gold). It hints at a shift away from trust in fiat money. It might hint subtly that industry and investment in the future might not not be able to function under fiat money.

Text Copyright 2008. D. Bellamy.

No comments: